Understanding DARVO: Recognizing Abuse Tactics in Relationships and Politics

What does D.A.R.V.O. mean?

DARVO is an acronym that stands for “Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.” It refers to a common strategy employed by abusers and manipulators in which they flip the script by denying their abusive behavior, attacking the credibility and character of their victims, and positioning themselves as the true victim. By understanding the history and dynamics of DARVO, we can better recognize these toxic patterns in personal relationships and politics.

The Origins of DARVO

The concept of DARVO was first identified and described by psychologist Jennifer Freyd in the 1990s. Freyd noted this pattern of behavior in abusers, particularly in cases of sexual abuse and assault. When confronted with allegations or evidence of their abusive actions, perpetrators would often default to denying the abuse occurred, launching attacks against the accuser, and casting themselves in the role of victim.

Recognizing DARVO in Personal Relationships

In interpersonal relationships, DARVO is a tactic frequently utilized by abusive partners to silence victims and avoid accountability. Here are some common signs that you may be experiencing DARVO:

Persistent Denial:

No matter how much you try to address issues, your partner refuses to acknowledge their hurtful actions or take responsibility. They insist you are misinterpreting or exaggerating.

Twisting the Narrative:

Your partner rewrites history, recasting themselves as the long-suffering victim. They bring up ways they feel you’ve wronged them while ignoring their own behaviors.

Character Assassination:

You find yourself on the defensive as your partner launches vicious personal attacks. They may call you “crazy,” “too sensitive,” or “abusive” in an attempt to discredit you.

Gaslighting:

Your partner undermines your grasp on reality, leading you to doubt your perceptions, memory, and judgment. Their denial is so adamant that you start to question yourself.

Blame-Shifting:

Every conflict becomes your fault in your partner’s eyes. They refuse to examine their own choices and instead make you feel responsible for their reactions.

Playing the Victim:

Your partner portrays themselves as the wounded party, accusing you of hurting them when you attempt to hold them accountable. They use guilt to manipulate you into backing down.

The Experience of DARVO

Being subjected to DARVO can be deeply destabilizing and traumatic. Victims often report feeling:

• Profound self-doubt and confusion
• A sense that they are “going crazy”
• Guilt and shame, even when they know they haven’t done anything wrong
• Frustration and anger at not being heard or validated
• Emotional exhaustion from constant circular arguments
• A seismic loss of trust in their own judgment and reality

Over time, DARVO erodes a victim’s self-esteem, confidence, and sense of self. They may start to blame themselves, question their worth, and feel trapped in the relationship.

Managing DARVO in Relationships

If you recognize the signs of DARVO in your relationship, here are some steps you can take:

Trust Your Instincts:

If something feels wrong, it probably is. Don’t let your partner convince you that you’re being irrational or overly sensitive.

Document Abusive Incidents:

Keep a journal detailing your partner’s actions and the impact on you. This can help you maintain perspective and provide a record if you need to seek help.

Set Firm Boundaries:

Be clear about what behaviors you will not tolerate. Calmly call out DARVO tactics when you see them and refuse to be derailed.

Prioritize Your Safety:

If your partner’s behavior escalates to physical threats, violence, or stalking, have a safety plan in place. Know how you will exit the situation and where you can go.

Reach Out for Support:

Confide in trusted friends, family members, or a therapist. You don’t have to face this alone.

Consider Leaving:

DARVO is a sign of an unhealthy, toxic dynamic. If your partner is unwilling to take accountability and change, it may be time to end the relationship.

DARVO vs. Addiction: Similarities and Differences

On the surface, DARVO and addiction may seem quite different—one is an interpersonal abuse tactic, while the other is a complex brain disorder involving compulsive substance use. However, there are some interesting parallels:

Similarities:

• Denial is central to both DARVO and addiction. Just as an abuser denies wrongdoing, an addict often denies the severity of their substance use problem.
• Both abusers and addicts may lash out at concerned loved ones who attempt to address the issue, casting them as the problem.
• Abusers and addicts alike can be skilled at manipulation, making empty promises to change and shifting blame to others.
• Both DARVO and addiction thrive on secrecy and isolation, which enable the harmful behavior to continue unchecked.
• DARVO and addiction are extremely difficult cycles to break without professional intervention and strong social support.

Differences:

• Addiction is a disease. While both devastate relationships, addiction is not a conscious choice or purposeful manipulation like DARVO.
• Addicts don’t seek to control and dominate others the way abusers employing DARVO do. Addicts’ focus is on the substance.
• While abusers seek to escape consequences, addicts are often self-destructive and spiral toward “rock bottom.”
• With comprehensive treatment, many addicts do recover. Abusers are often more resistant to change, as their behavior is rooted in entrenched beliefs and personality traits rather than a medical condition.

Understanding these similarities and differences can help us extend empathy while still holding people accountable for harmful actions. While neither DARVO nor addiction is acceptable, recognizing the forces driving these behaviors allows us to craft more effective interventions.

DARVO in Social Contexts

DARVO isn’t confined to romantic partnerships or politics. It can manifest in virtually any social context where there is a power imbalance and a motivation to maintain control. Here are some examples:

Friend Groups and Social Media:

DARVO can occur within friendships, especially when an individual is confronted about hurtful actions. They may deny wrongdoing, attack the accuser’s character (often rallying other friends against them), and claim victimhood. This can play out over text messages, social media posts, and in-person arguments.

Parental Friend Groups:

DARVO can arise among parents when someone attempts to address another parent’s problematic behavior, such as bullying, gossip, or exclusion. The offending parent may deny, attack their critics as “judgmental,” and portray themselves as the victim of a “witch hunt” or “mean girls.”

Faith Communities:

Religious leaders or members accused of misconduct may deploy DARVO against whistleblowers, questioning their faith, casting doubt on their motives, and framing themselves as persecuted. This can be especially painful and isolating for victims in tight-knit faith communities.

Professional Settings:

DARVO can manifest in workplace bullying, harassment, and discrimination. A superior confronted about mistreatment may deny it occurred, disparage the complainant’s work performance, and claim they are the one being “unfairly targeted.” This can create a chilling effect that silences other victims.

Executive Boardrooms:

High-powered executives accused of misconduct, fraud, or creating a toxic work culture may leverage DARVO against accusers. They may deny knowledge, attack critics as disgruntled employees with an agenda, and paint themselves as the victim of a “smear campaign” orchestrated by rivals.

In all these contexts, DARVO serves to silence victims, deflect accountability, and maintain the status quo. Recognizing this manipulative tactic is the first step in disrupting its power and supporting those who speak truth to power, even in the face of intimidation.

Finding Help and Support

Seeking professional help is crucial when dealing with an abusive situation. A therapist experienced in working with survivors of abuse can provide invaluable guidance and support. They can help you:

• Process and validate your experiences
• Identify and disrupt unhealthy relationship patterns
• Rebuild self-esteem and confidence
• Develop assertiveness and communication skills
• Create a safety plan
• Work through trauma with evidence-based treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)

Remember, abuse is never the victim’s fault. You deserve to be treated with respect and compassion.

DBT, Brainspotting, ETT, Somatic Therapy and Depth Therapy can all help heal trauma from abusive relationships and DARVO.

Related Concepts to DARVO in Psychology and Abuse Recovery

DARVO is just one piece of the complex puzzle of abusive relationships. Here are some related psychological concepts that can deepen our understanding:

Trauma Bonding:

The intense emotional attachment that develops in abusive relationships. Victims may feel “addicted” to their abusers.

Narcissistic Abuse:

Abuse perpetrated by someone with narcissistic personality disorder, characterized by grandiosity, entitlement, lack of empathy, and exploitation of others.

Cycle of Abuse:

The repeating pattern of abuse, which includes tension-building, an abusive incident, reconciliation, and a calm period before the cycle restarts.

Stockholm Syndrome:

A psychological response in which hostages or abuse victims develop positive feelings toward their captors and defend their actions.

Cognitive Dissonance:

The mental discomfort experienced by someone holding contradictory beliefs or encountering information that challenges their beliefs. Victims of abuse often struggle to reconcile their partner’s loving and abusive sides.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD):

A mental health condition that can develop after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, including domestic violence. Symptoms include flashbacks, nightmares, hypervigilance, and avoidance.

By understanding these related concepts, we gain a more holistic view of the dynamics and impacts of abuse.

Bibliography

Freyd, J. J. (1997). Violations of power, adaptive blindness, and betrayal trauma theory. Feminism & Psychology, 7(1), 22-32.

Harsey, S. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., & Freyd, J. J. (2017). Perpetrator responses to victim confrontation: DARVO and victim self-blame. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(6), 644-663.

Chung, J. E. (2019). Peer influence of online comments in newspapers: Applying social norms and the social identification model of deindividuation effects (SIDE). Social Science Computer Review, 37(4), 551-567.

Simon, G. (2010). In sheep’s clothing: Understanding and dealing with manipulative people. Parkhurst Brothers Publishers Inc.

Stern, R. (2007). The gaslight effect: How to spot and survive the hidden manipulation others use to control your life. Harmony.

Abramson, K. (2014). Turning up the lights on gaslighting. Philosophical Perspectives, 28, 1-30.

Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851-875.

Greenberg, E. (2017). Reframing campus conflict: Student conduct practice through the lens of inclusive excellence. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Stark, C. A. (2019). Gaslighting, misogyny, and psychological oppression. The Monist, 102(2), 221-235.

Spear, A. D. (2020). Gaslighting, confabulation, and epistemic innocence. Topoi, 39(1), 229-241.

Gass, G. Z., & Nichols, W. C. (1988). Gaslighting: A marital syndrome. Contemporary Family Therapy, 10(1), 3-16.

Thomas, L. (2018). Gaslight and gaslighting. Hypatia, 33(4), 791-806.

Wager, N., & Wager, A. R. (2020). Domestic violence advocacy: Representing battered women. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Violence (pp. 147-158). Routledge.

Barton, S., & Whitehead, J. (2019). The experiences of victims of crime with intellectual disabilities: A comparative exploration of the views of victims and carers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(4), 958-965.

Serrat, O. (2017). Gaslighting in the workplace. In Knowledge Solutions (pp. 883-888). Springer, Singapore.