Why Are There so Many Modalities of Psychotherapy?

The history of psychotherapy is a tumultuous one, marked by heated debates, acrimonious splits, and competing claims to truth. From its origins in Freudian psychoanalysis to the present-day landscape of integrative approaches, the field has been shaped by a succession of theoretical and clinical revolutions, each building on and reacting against what came before.

Freud and the Psychoanalytic Diaspora

The first great schism in the history of psychotherapy occurred within the ranks of Freudian psychoanalysis itself. While Sigmund Freud’s ideas about the unconscious, repression, and the structure of the psyche revolutionized thinking about the mind and behavior, his dogmatic insistence on the primacy of sexual drives and the Oedipus complex alienated many of his most gifted followers.

Alfred Adler, an early collaborator of Freud’s, broke with his mentor to establish Individual Psychology, which emphasized the importance of social context and “striving for superiority” in shaping personality. Adler saw human beings as fundamentally purposive, goal-directed creatures and argued that much psychological distress stemmed from feelings of inferiority and a lack of social interest.

An even more consequential split occurred with Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist whom Freud had anointed as his “crown prince” and intellectual heir. Jung challenged Freud’s focus on sexuality and childhood trauma, arguing instead for a view of the psyche as a self-regulating system with an innate drive towards wholeness and individuation.

Jung’s theory of archetypes and the collective unconscious reframed psychoanalysis as a modern continuation of perennial wisdom traditions, a move that sparked accusations of mysticism and anti-Semitism from Freud. Their bitter rupture divided the analytic community and marked the first great theoretical divergence in the field.

Other significant figures in the early psychoanalytic movement who ultimately rejected Freudian orthodoxy include Otto Rank, who developed an existentially-informed “will therapy”; Sandor Ferenczi, who pioneered a more empathic, relationally-attuned approach to treatment; and Karen Horney, who critiqued Freud’s views on female psychology and emphasized the importance of cultural factors in neurosis.

The Behaviorist Rebellion

The rise of behaviorism in the early 20th century represented a radical break not only with psychoanalysis but with the very idea of inner mental life as a legitimate object of scientific study. Led by John B. Watson and later B.F. Skinner, the behaviorists argued that psychology should restrict itself to observable behavior, jettisoning concepts like consciousness, mental images, and the unconscious as unscientific vestiges of a pre-experimental age.

Inspired by Ivan Pavlov‘s work on classical conditioning, Watson and his followers sought to establish psychology as a rigorously objective, empirically-based discipline on par with the natural sciences. They conducted experiments demonstrating how animal and human behavior could be shaped through principles of stimulus-response learning, and developed techniques for modifying problematic behaviors through operant conditioning.

While psychoanalysis remained ascendant in Europe, behaviorism quickly became the dominant force in American psychology, where its emphasis on prediction, control, and real-world application meshed well with the country’s pragmatic cultural ethos. Behaviorist ideas spread far beyond the confines of academia, influencing approaches to education, child-rearing, advertising, and social policy throughout much of the 20th century.

However, the behaviorist hegemony began to crack in the 1950s and 60s, as a new generation of thinkers challenged its reductionistic view of human nature and sought to reclaim the richness of subjective experience. The humanistic and existential movements, in particular, arose as a “third force” in psychology, rejecting both the determinism of psychoanalysis and the mechanistic stimulus-response model of behaviorism.

The Humanistic-Existential Insurgency

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a reaction against the limitations of both Freudian theory and behaviorist technique. Led by figures like Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow, the humanists emphasized the inherent potential for growth, creativity, and self-actualization in every individual. They saw psychological distress not as a symptom of repressed conflicts or maladaptive conditioned responses, but as a block to the full realization of one’s authentic self.

Rogers pioneered client-centered therapy, a non-directive approach that placed the client’s own capacity for insight and self-determination at the heart of the change process. He argued that the core conditions for therapeutic growth were empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence or authenticity on the part of the therapist. By providing a safe, accepting space for self-exploration, the therapist could help clients reconnect with their inner valuing process and move towards greater openness, integration, and self-trust.

Maslow, in turn, developed a theory of human motivation that positioned self-actualization at the pinnacle of a hierarchy of needs, from basic physiological and safety needs to higher-order desires for love, belonging, and esteem. He studied high-functioning, self-actualizing individuals and argued that psychology should focus not just on treating pathology but on cultivating human potential and fostering “peak experiences” of joy, creativity, and transcendence.

Existential therapy, which arose in parallel with humanistic psychology, drew on the philosophies of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Heidegger to grapple with the fundamental existential dilemmas of the human condition. Rollo May, Irvin Yalom, and Viktor Frankl explored how confronting themes of freedom, responsibility, isolation, and mortality could catalyze a process of personal transformation and lead to a more authentic, purposeful mode of being.

While the humanistic-existential approach offered a much-needed corrective to the reductionism and determinism of psychoanalysis and behaviorism, it was often critiqued for its lack of scientific rigor, its focus on the individual at the expense of the social context, and its potential for fostering a kind of solipsistic self-absorption.

The Postwar Era: Behaviorism, Humanism, and the Cognitive Revolution

In the postwar period, psychotherapy underwent a series of paradigm shifts that further fragmented the field. The rise of behaviorism in the 1950s, led by figures like B.F. Skinner, rejected the notion of inner experience altogether and sought to reduce psychology to the study of observable stimulus-response patterns. In reaction, humanistic pioneers like Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow championed a “third force” psychology centered on self-actualization and the phenomenology of authentic experience.

The cognitive revolution of the 1960s and 70s, meanwhile, reintroduced the mind as an information processing system and gave rise to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which aimed to correct irrational thoughts and maladaptive schemas. While each of these approaches offered valuable insights, they also tended to privilege certain dimensions of human functioning over others, leading to a kind of tunnel vision and tribalism within the field.

The Cognitive Revolution

Albert Ellis and Aaron Beck pioneered the development of cognitive therapy, which aimed to identify and correct the distorted thoughts and irrational beliefs seen as underlying emotional distress. They argued that psychological problems stem not from unconscious conflicts or environmental conditioning but from maladaptive cognitive schemas and dysfunctional self-talk. By teaching clients to monitor and challenge these negative cognitions, cognitive therapists sought to break the cycle of self-defeating emotions and behaviors.

Cognitive therapy (later cognitive-behavioral therapy or CBT) rapidly became one of the most widely practiced and extensively researched forms of psychotherapy, with demonstrated efficacy for a wide range of mental health conditions. Its structured, skills-based, time-limited approach fit well with the increasing demand for cost-effective, evidence-based treatments in the era of managed care.

However, critics charged that CBT’s emphasis on symptom relief and the correction of supposedly distorted cognitions neglected deeper issues of meaning, value, and interpersonal dynamics. The manualized, protocol-driven format of much CBT also risked reducing therapy to a mechanistic exercise, short-circuiting the crucial process of discovery and meaning-making catalyzed by the therapeutic relationship.

The Neuroexperiential Turn: Integrating Mind, Brain, and Body

In recent decades, a new wave of psychotherapies has emerged that seeks to bridge the divide between the cognitive, emotional, and somatic dimensions of experience. Drawing on research in neuroscience, developmental psychology, and trauma studies, these neuroexperiential approaches view the mind as fundamentally embodied and relational, shaped by the interplay of genes, early attachment patterns, and environmental factors.

One pioneer in this area was Wilhelm Reich, a student of Freud’s who developed a system of body-oriented psychotherapy focused on releasing blocked energy and resolving muscular armor. Reich’s work laid the foundation for later somatic approaches like Alexander Lowen’s bioenergetics and Peter Levine’s Somatic Experiencing.

Another key figure was Arnold Mindell, creator of process-oriented psychology. Mindell emphasizes the nonverbal, somatic, and dreamlike dimensions of experience, which he argues are always trying to express themselves through symptoms, synchronicities, and subtle body signals. By unfolding these “dreaming processes,” individuals can access new resources for healing and transformation.

More recently, modalities like Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Brainspotting have harnessed the power of bilateral stimulation to help clients process traumatic memories and integrate fragmented parts of the self.

Emotional Transformation Therapy (ETT), developed by Steven Vazquez, represents an innovative attempt to enhance the precision and efficiency of neuroexperiential methods. By using colored light and other forms of sensory stimulation to activate specific regions of the brain, ETT aims to rapidly transform entrenched emotional patterns and promote psychological integration.

Post-Jungian Developments: Multiplicity, Dialogue, and the Intersubjective Field

Even as the neuroexperiential therapies have gained traction, another stream of innovation has flowed from the post-Jungian tradition, with its emphasis on the creative and transpersonal dimensions of the psyche. In particular, a number of approaches have emerged that view the self as inherently multiple and dialogical, composed of various sub-personalities or part-selves.

Voice Dialogue, developed by Hal and Sidra Stone, is a method for contacting and engaging with these inner selves, which are seen as autonomous energy patterns with their own needs, feelings, and agendas. By facilitating dialogue between different voices, the therapist can help the client develop a more fluid and inclusive sense of identity.

The Internal Family Systems (IFS) model, created by Richard Schwartz, takes a similar approach but adds a systems perspective, viewing the inner world as an ecology of interacting parts that can become polarized or entangled with each other. IFS also posits the existence of a core Self that can provide compassionate leadership for this inner family.

Both Voice Dialogue and IFS build on Jung’s concept of active imagination, a process of engaging with the personified images of the psyche via visualization, movement, and artistic expression. These modalities also share some common ground with existential and phenomenological therapies, which emphasize the here-and-now embodied encounter between therapist and client.

Intersubjectivity theory, developed by relational psychoanalysts like Robert Stolorow and George Atwood, adds a further dimension to this dialogical view of the self. Intersubjectivity posits that the self comes into being within the shared field of the therapeutic relationship, co-created by the subjectivities of both therapist and client. Ruptures and enactments are seen not as obstacles to treatment but as opportunities to explore the sometimes conflictual nature of this intersubjective field.

Towards an Integral Vision

As this brief survey suggests, the history of psychotherapy is in many ways a history of the human struggle to make sense of the mind’s complexity and restore a sense of wholeness to a fragmented psyche. Each new modality and theoretical rebellion has been a kind of puzzle piece, illuminating one facet of the self while obscuring others.

The challenge for contemporary therapists is to develop a more integral vision that can hold these multiple dimensions in creative tension. We need approaches that honor the biological, psychological, social, existential, and spiritual aspects of human experience without collapsing them into a reductionistic framework. We need theories that can accommodate both the universal patterns and the infinite diversity of the psyche, the objective realities of neuroscience and the subjective truths of lived experience.

The path ahead is uncharted and the challenges formidable, but the potential rewards are great. For as we work towards a more holistic and integrative psychology, we also work towards a more whole and healed world. May we have the courage and humility to walk this path with grace, holding fast to the enduring hope and vision of our therapeutic ancestors.

Resources on More Models of Psychotherapy

International Association for Analytical Psychology (IAAP)

The IAAP is the primary international organization for Jungian analysts, offering training standards, certification, and professional development.
🔗 IAAP Official Website

Pacifica Graduate Institute – Contemporary Analytical Psychology

Pacifica offers graduate programs in depth psychology and Jungian-oriented studies, with courses on the practical application of Jungian analysis.
🔗 Pacifica’s Analytical Psychology Program

British Psychotherapy Foundation – Jungian Psychotherapy Training

The BPF provides training in Jungian psychotherapy for those seeking to become accredited analysts in the UK.
🔗 BPF Jungian Psychotherapy Training

Jung Institute of Chicago – Analyst Training Program

This program provides in-depth training in Jungian analysis, combining theory, personal analysis, and supervised practice.
🔗 Jung Institute of Chicago Training

British Psychotherapy Foundation – Jungian Analytic Training

This program is designed for those who want to specialize in Jungian analytic psychotherapy, integrating theory and clinical practice.
🔗 BPF Jungian Analytic Training

Psychoanalysis

A therapeutic approach that explores unconscious motivations and conflicts, often rooted in early childhood experiences.

The Institute for Contemporary Psychotherapy offers a 4-year Psychoanalytic Training Program.

Humanistic-Existential Therapy

Emphasizes personal growth, self-actualization, and the search for meaning.

The Existential-Humanistic Institute offers workshops and training programs.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Combines cognitive and behavioral techniques to modify dysfunctional thinking and behavior.

The Beck Institute provides CBT training and certification programs.

Neuroexperiential Therapy

Integrates neuroscience with experiential therapeutic techniques to address trauma and emotional regulation.

The Syzygy Institute offers courses that integrate Internal Family Systems (IFS) with EMDR, focusing on neuroexperiential approaches.

Brainspotting

A therapeutic approach that identifies and processes trauma by locating points in the client’s visual field that correlate with emotional distress.

Brainspotting International offers training programs for therapists.

Emotional Transformation Therapy (ETT)

Combines light, color, and eye movement techniques to alleviate emotional distress.

The ETT Institute provides training and certification in Emotional Transformation Therapy.

Voice Dialogue

A therapeutic method that explores the various selves or sub-personalities within an individual.

The Voice Dialogue International offers workshops and training materials.

Bibliography

Anchin, J. C. (2008). Pursuing a unifying paradigm for psychotherapy: Tasks, dialectical considerations, and biopsychosocial systems metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(3), 310-349.

Anderson, H., & Gehart, D. (Eds.). (2012). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. Routledge.

Boswell, J. F., Castonguay, L. G., & Pincus, A. L. (2009). Trainee theoretical orientation: Profiles and potential predictors. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 19(3), 291-312.

Castonguay, L. G., & Hill, C. E. (Eds.). (2012). Transformation in psychotherapy: Corrective experiences across cognitive behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic approaches. American Psychological Association.

Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Wampold, B. E., & Hubble, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy. American Psychological Association.

Feinstein, D. (2019). Energy psychology: Efficacy, speed, mechanisms. Explore, 15(5), 340-351.

Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1993). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy. JHU Press.

Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world‐making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287-310.

Goldfried, M. R. (Ed.). (2013). Evidence-based psychotherapy treatment planning [Special issue]. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 68(5).

Greenberg, L. S., & Goldman, R. N. (2019). Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy. American Psychological Association.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. Guilford Press.

Henriques, G. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.

Leichsenring, F., & Steinert, C. (2018). Towards an evidence-based unified psychodynamic protocol for emotional disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 232, 400-416.

Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

Magnavita, J. J. (2008). Toward unification of clinical science: The next wave in the evolution of psychotherapy? Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(3), 264-291.

Marks-Tarlow, T., Siegel, D. J., & Solomon, M. (Eds.). (2018). Play and creativity in psychotherapy. WW Norton & Company.

Norcross, J. C., & Goldfried, M. R. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of psychotherapy integration. Oxford University Press.

Ogden, P., & Fisher, J. (2015). Sensorimotor psychotherapy: Interventions for trauma and attachment. WW Norton & Company.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. WW Norton & Company.

Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2013). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Cengage Learning.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. Penguin UK.

Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. Routledge.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press.