Dissociation is a disconnection between parts of experience that normally run together: thoughts, feelings, body sensations, memory, your surroundings and your sense of who you are. Brief forms are common, like zoning out on a familiar drive or feeling unreal after a shock. It becomes a clinical problem when it is frequent, distressing or involves lost time, and it is closely tied to overwhelming stress.

The argument of this page: at its clinical end, dissociation usually works as a protective shutdown, a last-resort defense when fighting or fleeing is not possible, and one word covers two different processes. Detachment makes the self or the world feel distant and unreal. Compartmentalization walls memories, feelings or whole ways of being off from awareness. Everyday daydreaming is not a small dose of dissociative identity disorder. Good treatment respects the job dissociation is doing, builds enough stability to stay present, then works with what was overwhelming, using psychotherapies with outcome data. The brain research is real, but it does not yet support brain maps or devices as treatments.

What dissociation is, and what it is not

The DSM-5-TR describes the dissociative disorders as a disruption or discontinuity in the normal integration of consciousness, memory, identity, emotion, perception, body representation, motor control and behavior.¹ The manual places them next to the trauma- and stressor-related disorders, though not inside that chapter, to reflect how closely the two are linked. That placement matters. Dissociation sometimes gets filed alongside autism and ADHD under neurodivergence, but it is not a neurodevelopmental difference. It is a state the mind enters, most often under threat, and a state that can harden into a habit.

It is also not psychosis. A person with depersonalization feels unreal while knowing they are real; the criteria require that reality testing stay intact.¹ That double awareness is part of what makes it frightening, and cognitive treatment works directly on catastrophic readings of the symptoms, along with the avoidance and constant self-checking that keep them going.²

At the mild end, dissociation is very common. A systematic review of depersonalization and derealization found lifetime rates of transient symptoms between 26 and 74 percent in general-population samples, and between 31 and 66 percent at the time of a traumatic event. Population surveys using diagnostic interviews put clinically significant depersonalization and derealization at roughly 1 to 2 percent.³

The harder question is whether all of this sits on one line, a continuum from daydreaming to dissociative identity disorder. In 1996 Niels Waller, Frank Putnam and Eve Carlson tested that idea with taxometric statistics on questionnaire answers from 228 adults diagnosed with what was then called multiple personality disorder and 228 controls. Nonpathological dissociative experiences behaved like a trait everyone has to some degree. Pathological dissociation behaved like a category a person either belongs to or does not, and an eight-item subset of the Dissociative Experiences Scale, the DES-T, was built to identify it.⁴

A 2005 review by Emily Holmes and colleagues argued that the field had converged on two qualitatively different phenomena sharing one name: detachment, and compartmentalization, in which processes normally available to awareness or control, such as memory or movement, are walled off. They judged the evidence supportive but in need of controlled tests, and proposed that the distinction should guide case formulation and treatment.⁵

The main forms: from feeling unreal to losing time

Depersonalization is detachment from your own mind or body: watching yourself from a step behind, hearing your voice as if it belonged to someone else, feeling emotionally flat. Derealization is the same detachment pointed outward, so the room looks flat, foggy, dreamlike or staged. Both are detachment in the Holmes sense. When they are persistent or recurrent and cause distress, the DSM-5-TR diagnosis is depersonalization/derealization disorder.¹

Dissociative amnesia is an inability to recall important personal information, usually of a traumatic or stressful nature, that goes beyond ordinary forgetting.¹ This is the most disputed corner of the field. Steven Jay Lynn and colleagues have argued that the idea of encoding a trauma and then being unable to recall it lacks strong empirical support.⁶ Clinicians should take a patient’s memory gaps seriously and should be just as careful not to suggest what might fill them.

Identity alteration is the compartmentalized end. In dissociative identity disorder (DID), a person has two or more distinct personality states, along with recurrent gaps in memory for everyday events, personal information or traumatic events. When the picture is similar but does not meet full criteria, the diagnosis is often other specified dissociative disorder, a category the manual includes for exactly that situation.¹ Our in-depth guide to dissociative identity disorder covers diagnosis and overlapping conditions in more detail.

Dissociation also appears inside other diagnoses. PTSD can carry a “with dissociative symptoms” specifier when depersonalization or derealization persists.¹ In the World Mental Health Surveys of 25,018 people in 16 countries, 14.4 percent of those with past-year PTSD reported these symptoms, and they had more childhood adversity, more severe impairment and more suicidality.⁷ One of the nine criteria for borderline personality disorder is transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms,¹ a diagnosis whose overlap with mood disorders we take up in a separate piece on borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder.

Why the mind does this: the end of the defense cascade

Dissociation is often called a mental flight response. It is closer to what happens when flight has failed. Kasia Kozlowska and colleagues describe a defense cascade built into all humans: arousal, then fight or flight, then freezing, and finally tonic and collapsed immobility, which they call responses of last resort to inescapable threat once active defenses have failed.⁸ Maggie Schauer and Thomas Elbert proposed a similar sequence, “freeze, flight, fight, fright, flag, faint,” and argued that the stages a person went through during a trauma tend to replay when the memory is reactivated. If the body shut down then, it is likely to shut down again when reminded.⁹

Seen this way, dissociation has a job. Numbness, distance and the sense that this is not really happening reduce how much has to be felt when nothing can be done. Ruth Lanius and colleagues describe the dissociative subtype of PTSD in those terms: emotional overmodulation, in which midline prefrontal regions inhibit the limbic regions that generate fear. That is the opposite of the undermodulated, hyperaroused pattern of most PTSD, in which prefrontal inhibition of the same regions fails.¹⁰

The protection has a price. In a 2003 meta-analysis of 68 studies, dissociation during or just after a trauma was the strongest of seven predictors of later PTSD, with a weighted correlation of .35.¹¹ A 2008 meta-analysis of 59 studies confirmed the association but found its size depended heavily on study design, and concluded the data could not establish cause and effect.¹² Clinically, the problem is less the shutdown itself than a nervous system that keeps reaching for it after the danger has passed.

Three explanations, and the argument between them

The trauma model holds that overwhelming experience, especially in childhood, causes pathological dissociation. A 2012 review by Constance Dalenberg and colleagues tested eight competing predictions and found a consistent, moderate relationship between trauma and dissociation that held when trauma was measured objectively and when fantasy proneness was controlled. Dissociation was not reliably associated with suggestibility.¹³

The sociocognitive model is most closely associated with Nicholas Spanos, who argued in 1994 that multiple identities are socially constructed: context-bound, goal-directed social behavior geared to the expectations of significant others, therapists included.¹⁴ Lynn and colleagues replied that the trauma model leaps from correlation to causation and underestimates the link between dissociation and false memory, while granting trauma some causal role.⁶ In a 2016 review, Bethany Brand and colleagues countered that research does not support the claim that DID is mainly iatrogenic, and that DID not targeted in treatment does not appear to resolve.¹⁵

By 2022 Lynn’s group argued that neither model is satisfactory, describing dissociation as the failure of normally adaptive systems and pointing to interacting factors such as sleep disturbance, poor inhibition of negative thoughts and feelings, and problems with reality testing and metacognition.¹⁶ For clinicians that is a useful correction. Trauma matters a great deal, but it is not the only road in, and sleep is worth asking about early.

Structural dissociation theory, set out by Onno van der Hart, Ellert Nijenhuis and Kathy Steele in The Haunted Self (2006), is the clinical map behind much phase-oriented trauma therapy.¹⁷ It describes an “apparently normal part” of the personality that runs daily life while avoiding traumatic memory, and one or more “emotional parts” fixed in the defensive states of the trauma. The idea is not that a whole self shatters, but that trauma keeps parts of the personality from ever integrating. Janina Fisher’s parts-based approach builds on it, as described in our profile of Janina Fisher and structural dissociation. It is best read as a clinical model that organizes treatment, not as a tested finding.

What the brain research shows, and what it cannot do yet

An influential model of depersonalization came from Mauricio Sierra and German Berrios in 1998: a left-sided prefrontal mechanism inhibits the amygdala, damping autonomic arousal and the emotional coloring of experience, which a person then reports as unreality or detachment.¹⁸ Imaging has broadly supported the damping. In a small fMRI study, six patients with depersonalization disorder showed less activation than controls in the insula and occipitotemporal cortex while viewing aversive pictures, and more in the right ventral prefrontal cortex, a region tied to regulating emotion.¹⁹ Later work from the same group linked blunted emotion to reduced insula activity and clinical improvement to increased insula activity.²⁰

Other findings point elsewhere, and the details matter. A 2000 PET study of eight people with depersonalization disorder found lower metabolism in the right superior and middle temporal gyri and higher metabolism in parietal and occipital association cortex, areas that integrate the senses and the body schema.²¹ In PTSD, as noted above, the dissociative subtype is associated with more prefrontal inhibition of limbic regions, not less.¹⁰

A 2021 systematic review of 205 studies by Monika Roydeva and Antje Reinders identified candidate markers of pathological dissociation, including prefrontal and cingulate activity and smaller hippocampal, basal ganglia and thalamic volumes. Heart rate, blood pressure and skin conductance findings were inconclusive, and genetic studies were too limited to point anywhere.²² These are group averages from research studies. None is established as a test that tells one person whether they dissociate or which treatment they need, and neither is a qEEG brain map. We make the same point in our review of what qEEG and neuromodulation research actually shows.

What the treatment evidence supports

The standard approach to complex dissociative disorders is phase-oriented psychotherapy. The adult treatment guidelines of the International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation (ISSTD), revised in 2011, trace this approach to Pierre Janet in the late nineteenth century and set out three phases: establishing safety, stabilization and symptom reduction; confronting, working through and integrating traumatic memories; and identity integration and rehabilitation. The phases overlap, trauma work is “carefully titrated and paced,” and a desirable outcome is “a workable form of integration or harmony among alternate identities.”²³

The evidence behind that consensus is real but limited. A 2009 review found 16 treatment outcome studies and four case studies. Treatment was associated with less dissociation, depression, PTSD, distress and suicidality, with medium to large pre-post effects, but the studies were small, mostly nonrandomized and vulnerable to regression to the mean.²⁴ The Treatment of Patients with Dissociative Disorders (TOP DD) studies followed people with DID and related disorders seen by community therapists. Over 30 months, the 119 of 226 patients who completed follow-up reported less dissociation, PTSD and depression, and their therapists reported less self-injury and fewer hospitalizations.²⁵ An online psychoeducation and skills program for 111 patients was associated with reduced dissociation, PTSD symptoms and non-suicidal self-injury, yet in 2019 its authors were still calling for randomized controlled trials.²⁶

For PTSD with dissociative symptoms, the news is better than many therapists assume. A 2020 meta-analysis of 21 trials with 1,714 patients found that pre-treatment dissociation did not predict how well psychotherapy for PTSD worked.²⁷ In one study of an intensive trauma-focused program, the 38 patients who met criteria for the dissociative subtype improved as much as the 130 who did not, and about two-thirds of them no longer met criteria for the subtype afterward.²⁸ Dissociation is a reason to adapt and pace trauma therapy. On its own, it is not a reason to withhold it.

That bears on a live argument about stabilization. In Marylène Cloitre’s 2010 trial with 104 women who had PTSD related to childhood abuse, skills training in emotional and interpersonal regulation followed by exposure produced sustained full remission in 27 percent, against 13 percent for skills plus supportive counseling and none for counseling plus exposure, with fewer cases of worsening.²⁹ In 2016 Ad de Jongh, Patricia Resick and colleagues countered that the research behind a mandatory stabilization phase is methodologically limited and may delay treatment people could use now.³⁰ Both can be true. The ISSTD guidelines call for a stabilization phase in DID, while the PTSD data suggest that dissociative symptoms alone are not a reason to put off trauma-focused work.

For depersonalization disorder specifically, cognitive behavioral therapy has been studied: in an open trial of 21 patients without a control group, 29 percent no longer met criteria after treatment focused on reinterpreting symptoms as non-threatening and reducing avoidance and symptom monitoring.² On medication, the ISSTD guidelines are blunt: “Psychotropic medication is not a primary treatment for dissociative processes.” Medication is often used for co-occurring PTSD symptoms, depression or obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and decisions about it belong with a prescriber who knows the whole picture.²³

Body-based and brain-based methods: an honest scorecard

Taproot offers several of the methods below. I am trained in EMDR and Brainspotting and certified in Emotional Transformation Therapy, so it is worth being exact about what each has and has not shown.

EMDR has the largest trial base of the group. A 2020 meta-analysis of 76 trials found a large effect for PTSD against control conditions but judged study quality too low for definite conclusions.³¹ For dissociation the issue is safety. The ISSTD guidelines report that standard EMDR with unrecognized DID led to flooding, abrupt emergence of alternate identities and rapid destabilization, and urge clinicians to assess every client for dissociation first and to modify the protocols for DID.²³ The story of how the method began is told in our profile of Francine Shapiro and the origins of EMDR.

Somatic Experiencing treats post-traumatic symptoms by working with the interoceptive and proprioceptive sensations tied to the traumatic experience. One randomized trial in 63 people with PTSD found large improvements compared with a waitlist,³² and a 2021 scoping review called the evidence promising but of mixed quality, in need of unbiased randomized trials.³³ It has not been tested in dissociative disorders as such.

Brainspotting, developed by David Grand,³⁴ is sometimes described as a bilateral eye-movement method. It is not. The client holds their gaze on one point in the visual field that matches the body activation they feel when describing a traumatic event, while the therapist stays closely attuned. Its proposed midbrain mechanism is a hypothesis its authors set out as testable, not proven.³⁵ The controlled evidence is small. A 2022 within-subject study of 40 psychologists and physicians, not patients, found that single sessions of Brainspotting and EMDR reduced distress about personal memories more than body scan meditation or a reading control.³⁶ There are no trials in dissociative disorders.

Lifespan Integration, developed by Peggy Pace, takes a client through repeated passes of a timeline of their own memories, from a target memory to the present, aiming at a coherent life narrative. The research I could find does not include dissociative disorders. It consists mainly of single-case studies³⁷ and one pilot randomized trial of a one-session modified version for women with PTSD after a single sexual assault, which excluded people with multiple traumas. In that pilot, 72 percent of the treated group no longer scored in the PTSD range three weeks later, against 6 percent on the waitlist.³⁸ That is a promising result in nearly the opposite of the complex, repeatedly traumatized population most likely to dissociate.

Emotional Transformation Therapy was developed by Steven Vazquez. It pairs an attachment-focused relationship with what he calls the client’s visual ecology: a saturated spectral color chart, directed eye movements, peripheral eye stimulation, and specific wavelengths of light delivered to the eyes during verbal processing.³⁹ It is not a cognitive-behavioral schema therapy. I found no ETT studies indexed in PubMed and no controlled trial. We use it as one tool inside trauma therapy, not as a proven treatment for dissociation.

Neurofeedback and qEEG. One early study of neurofeedback for DID was a 1998 report on 11 women who received 30 sessions of alpha-theta neurofeedback plus 10 group sessions, with no control group. The protocol rewarded alpha and theta activity to bring patients into a hypnagogic reverie state, so describing it as training patients to reduce frontal theta gets the method backwards.⁴⁰ For PTSD generally, a 2020 systematic review found four small randomized trials with 123 participants, all favorable, and rated the certainty of the evidence very low.⁴¹ The most specific recent work, a 2025 analysis of three small studies of amygdala-targeted neurofeedback, found large within-group improvements in dissociative symptoms but no statistically significant difference from control groups over time, and its authors called for larger controlled trials. Several of those authors work for or consult for GrayMatters Health, the company developing the method.⁴²

Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been tried for depersonalization disorder. In a single-session study of 17 patients, stimulation of either the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex or the temporoparietal junction reduced symptoms, which the authors noted may have been a nonspecific effect.⁴³ A follow-up case series gave seven patients up to 20 sessions and found an average 44 percent reduction in depersonalization scores, and the authors called for a randomized trial.⁴⁴ That is the honest state of the field: plausible and early. For now, neurofeedback and TMS for dissociation are experimental, and qEEG maps have no established role in diagnosing it or choosing its treatment. If they are used at all, it should be as an add-on to psychotherapy, with clear informed consent about how thin the evidence is, and never in place of it.

What this looks like in therapy

Assessment comes first, because dissociation hides. Many people have no word for it. They describe losing chunks of a day, finding things they do not remember buying, feeling as if they live behind glass, or going numb whenever a certain subject comes up. A clinician will ask about these directly and may use the Dissociative Experiences Scale or its taxon subset.^{45, 4} Substances, medication effects and conditions such as seizures can also produce dissociative symptoms, and the diagnostic criteria require ruling them out.¹

Next comes a shared explanation. Understanding numbness, spacing out or switching as the mind’s emergency brake, not a character flaw or a sign of madness, gives client and therapist a common language. Psychoeducation of this kind was the core of the TOP DD online program.²⁶

Stabilization is practical: grounding skills that bring attention back to the present through the senses, noticing early signs of drifting away, protecting sleep, safety planning and, for people with dissociative parts, building cooperation between them. Coping with Trauma-Related Dissociation by Suzette Boon, Kathy Steele and Onno van der Hart lays out this kind of skills training.⁴⁶ Some common advice needs adapting. In a study of Western Buddhist meditators, practice brought up challenging experiences, including changes in the sense of self, with impairment ranging from minimal and transient to severe and enduring.⁴⁷ We explain how to adapt it in why meditation can sometimes make trauma worse.

Processing comes when a person can stay present enough to take something from it, using a trauma-focused therapy with trial support for PTSD, such as EMDR, adapted for dissociation where needed. Approaches with thinner evidence, such as Brainspotting or somatic work, can be offered when the person understands that, and the choice should fit the person rather than the therapist’s favorite tool. Our explainer on how the different types of therapy fit together lays out that logic. The work is paced to keep the client within a tolerable range, eyes open and oriented to the room when needed, and returns to stabilization whenever it has to. When parts are involved, it goes through them rather than around them.

Severe dissociative disorders carry high rates of self-injury and suicide attempts,²⁶ so safety comes before everything else. If you are in danger now, call or text 988, or use our crisis resources for Birmingham.

If you recognize yourself here, the next step is an assessment with someone who knows dissociation well. Our dissociation therapy page explains how we work with numbness, lost time and dissociative disorders in Hoover, and you can contact us to ask whether we are a good fit.

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
2. Hunter, E. C. M., Baker, D., Phillips, M. L., Sierra, M., & David, A. S. (2005). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for depersonalisation disorder: An open study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(9), 1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.003
3. Hunter, E. C. M., Sierra, M., & David, A. S. (2004). The epidemiology of depersonalisation and derealisation: A systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0701-4
4. Waller, N. G., Putnam, F. W., & Carlson, E. B. (1996). Types of dissociation and dissociative types: A taxometric analysis of dissociative experiences. Psychological Methods, 1(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.3.300
5. Holmes, E. A., Brown, R. J., Mansell, W., Fearon, R. P., Hunter, E. C. M., Frasquilho, F., & Oakley, D. A. (2005). Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.08.006
6. Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., McNally, R. J., Loftus, E. F., Bruck, M., Garry, M., & Malaktaris, A. (2014). The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035570
7. Stein, D. J., Koenen, K. C., Friedman, M. J., Hill, E., McLaughlin, K. A., Petukhova, M., Ruscio, A. M., Shahly, V., Spiegel, D., Borges, G., Bunting, B., Caldas-de-Almeida, J. M., de Girolamo, G., Demyttenaere, K., Florescu, S., Haro, J. M., Karam, E. G., Kovess-Masfety, V., Lee, S., . . . Kessler, R. C. (2013). Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder: Evidence from the World Mental Health Surveys. Biological Psychiatry, 73(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.022
8. Kozlowska, K., Walker, P., McLean, L., & Carrive, P. (2015). Fear and the defense cascade: Clinical implications and management. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 23(4), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000065
9. Schauer, M., & Elbert, T. (2010). Dissociation following traumatic stress: Etiology and treatment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 218(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000018
10. Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Schmahl, C., Bremner, J. D., & Spiegel, D. (2010). Emotion modulation in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(6), 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168
11. Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52
12. Lensvelt-Mulders, G., van der Hart, O., van Ochten, J. M., van Son, M. J. M., Steele, K., & Breeman, L. (2008). Relations among peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.006
13. Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., Frewen, P. A., Carlson, E. B., & Spiegel, D. (2012). Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 550–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027447
14. Spanos, N. P. (1994). Multiple identity enactments and multiple personality disorder: A sociocognitive perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.143
15. Brand, B. L., Şar, V., Stavropoulos, P., Krüger, C., Korzekwa, M., Martínez-Taboas, A., & Middleton, W. (2016). Separating fact from fiction: An empirical examination of six myths about dissociative identity disorder. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 24(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000100
16. Lynn, S. J., Polizzi, C., Merckelbach, H., Chiu, C.-D., Maxwell, R., van Heugten, D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2022). Dissociation and dissociative disorders reconsidered: Beyond sociocognitive and trauma models toward a transtheoretical framework. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18, 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-102424
17. van der Hart, O., Nijenhuis, E. R. S., & Steele, K. (2006). The haunted self: Structural dissociation and the treatment of chronic traumatization. W. W. Norton.
18. Sierra, M., & Berrios, G. E. (1998). Depersonalization: Neurobiological perspectives. Biological Psychiatry, 44(9), 898–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00015-8
19. Phillips, M. L., Medford, N., Senior, C., Bullmore, E. T., Suckling, J., Brammer, M. J., Andrew, C., Sierra, M., Williams, S. C. R., & David, A. S. (2001). Depersonalization disorder: Thinking without feeling. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 108(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-4927(01)00119-6
20. Medford, N., Sierra, M., Stringaris, A., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2016). Emotional experience and awareness of self: Functional MRI studies of depersonalization disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00432
21. Simeon, D., Guralnik, O., Hazlett, E. A., Spiegel-Cohen, J., Hollander, E., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (2000). Feeling unreal: A PET study of depersonalization disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(11), 1782–1788. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1782
22. Roydeva, M. I., & Reinders, A. A. T. S. (2021). Biomarkers of pathological dissociation: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 123, 120–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.019
23. International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation. (2011). Guidelines for treating dissociative identity disorder in adults, third revision. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 12(2), 115–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2011.537247
24. Brand, B. L., Classen, C. C., McNary, S. W., & Zaveri, P. (2009). A review of dissociative disorders treatment studies. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(9), 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b3afaa
25. Brand, B. L., McNary, S. W., Myrick, A. C., Classen, C. C., Lanius, R., Loewenstein, R. J., Pain, C., & Putnam, F. W. (2013). A longitudinal naturalistic study of patients with dissociative disorders treated by community clinicians. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027654
26. Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., Putnam, K. T., Putnam, F. W., Loewenstein, R. J., Myrick, A., Jepsen, E. K. K., Langeland, W., Steele, K., Classen, C. C., & Lanius, R. A. (2019). An online educational program for individuals with dissociative disorders and their clinicians: 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22370
27. Hoeboer, C. M., De Kleine, R. A., Molendijk, M. L., Schoorl, M., Oprel, D. A. C., Mouthaan, J., Van der Does, W., & Van Minnen, A. (2020). Impact of dissociation on the effectiveness of psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: Meta-analysis. BJPsych Open, 6(3), Article e53. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.30
28. Zoet, H. A., Wagenmans, A., van Minnen, A., & de Jongh, A. (2018). Presence of the dissociative subtype of PTSD does not moderate the outcome of intensive trauma-focused treatment for PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 9(1), Article 1468707. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1468707
29. Cloitre, M., Stovall-McClough, K. C., Nooner, K., Zorbas, P., Cherry, S., Jackson, C. L., Gan, W., & Petkova, E. (2010). Treatment for PTSD related to childhood abuse: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(8), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09081247
30. De Jongh, A., Resick, P. A., Zoellner, L. A., van Minnen, A., Lee, C. W., Monson, C. M., Foa, E. B., Wheeler, K., ten Broeke, E., Feeny, N., Rauch, S. A., Chard, K. M., Mueser, K. T., Sloan, D. M., van der Gaag, M., Rothbaum, B. O., Neuner, F., de Roos, C., Hehenkamp, L. M., . . . Bicanic, I. A. (2016). Critical analysis of the current treatment guidelines for complex PTSD in adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(5), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22469
31. Cuijpers, P., van Veen, S. C., Sijbrandij, M., Yoder, W., & Cristea, I. A. (2020). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 49(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2019.1703801
32. Brom, D., Stokar, Y., Lawi, C., Nuriel-Porat, V., Ziv, Y., Lerner, K., & Ross, G. (2017). Somatic experiencing for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled outcome study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 30(3), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22189
33. Kuhfuß, M., Maldei, T., Hetmanek, A., & Baumann, N. (2021). Somatic experiencing – effectiveness and key factors of a body-oriented trauma therapy: A scoping literature review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), Article 1929023. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1929023
34. Grand, D. (2013). Brainspotting: The revolutionary new therapy for rapid and effective change. Sounds True.
35. Corrigan, F., & Grand, D. (2013). Brainspotting: Recruiting the midbrain for accessing and healing sensorimotor memories of traumatic activation. Medical Hypotheses, 80(6), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.03.005
36. D’Antoni, F., Matiz, A., Fabbro, F., & Crescentini, C. (2022). Psychotherapeutic techniques for distressing memories: A comparative study between EMDR, Brainspotting, and body scan meditation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031142
37. Lewis, C., Kwee, J., Rossen, L., & McDonald, M. (2022). Integrating attachment processes with Lifespan Integration therapy: A hermeneutic single case efficacy design with an adopted child. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 15(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-021-00395-5
38. Rajan, G., Wachtler, C., Lee, S., Wändell, P., Philips, B., Wahlström, L., Svedin, C. G., & Carlsson, A. C. (2022). A one-session treatment of PTSD after single sexual assault trauma. A pilot study of the WONSA MLI project: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP6582–NP6603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520965973
39. Vazquez, S. R. (2012). Emotional transformation therapy: An interactive ecological psychotherapy. Jason Aronson. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216510253
40. Manchester, C. F., Allen, T., & Tachiki, K. H. (1998). Treatment of dissociative identity disorder with neurotherapy and group self-exploration. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2(4), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/j184v02n04_03
41. Steingrimsson, S., Bilonic, G., Ekelund, A.-C., Larson, T., Stadig, I., Svensson, M., Vukovic, I. S., Wartenberg, C., Wrede, O., & Bernhardsson, S. (2020). Electroencephalography-based neurofeedback as treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 63(1), Article e7. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.7
42. Harmelech, T., Hendler, T., Gurevitch, G., Fine, N., Fruchter, E., Amital, D., Goldental, N., Gross, R., Robinson, M. A., Lebois, L. A., Kaufman, M., & Tendler, A. (2025). Amygdala-targeted neurofeedback for dissociative symptoms in PTSD: Converging evidence from three independent studies. Psychiatry Research, 353, Article 116752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116752
43. Jay, E.-L., Sierra, M., Van den Eynde, F., Rothwell, J. C., & David, A. S. (2014). Testing a neurobiological model of depersonalization disorder using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 7(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.002
44. Jay, E.-L., Nestler, S., Sierra, M., McClelland, J., Kekic, M., & David, A. S. (2016). Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depersonalization disorder: A consecutive case series. Psychiatry Research, 240, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.027
45. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
46. Boon, S., Steele, K., & van der Hart, O. (2011). Coping with trauma-related dissociation: Skills training for patients and therapists. W. W. Norton.
47. Lindahl, J. R., Fisher, N. E., Cooper, D. J., Rosen, R. K., & Britton, W. B. (2017). The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0176239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176239